Terrible
fate in store for HMS Sheffield
In early 1982, the Type 42 destroyer HMS
Sheffield was on her way home to Portsmouth after
several months patrolling the Gulf of Oman.
Families of the crew were
eagerly awaiting the return of their loved ones,
when the ship was re-routed from Gibraltar to
sail to the South Atlantic because of a conflict
over an obscure group of islands 8,000 miles
away.
| |
It was a
close contest and the price for this war
which should never have happened was 236
British and 750 Argentinian dead. |
Commanding officer, Captain
James `Sam' Salt, sent a message via the ship's
satellite communications system asking The News
to convey best wishes to family and friends at
home.
His message was simple. `We
hope you all had a very happy Easter. We are fit
and well,' he said.
Less than a month later on May
4, HMS Sheffield was hit by an Exocet missile
fired from an Argentinian Super Etendard aircraft.
Twenty of her crew were killed and the ship
abandoned as fires raged on board.
The short time which had
elapsed between HMS Sheffield's interrupted
journey and her destruction, is an indication of
how fast events moved in the whirlwind of the
Falklands crisis 15 years ago.
It was a whirlwind which had
caught the British government off-guard.
Not only did it reflect badly
on a foreign policy which had constantly failed
to resolve the dispute with Argentina over the
Falkland Islands, but also on those who ignored
warnings of an imminent invasion.
It also exposed the failings of
the government strategy of concentrating defence
spending on countering the threat from the Soviet
Union in Europe while largely ignoring other
potential areas of conflict.
This strategy was responsible
for plans to savagely cutback the navy, including
the intended sale of the aircraft carrier HMS
Invincible.
It was a supreme irony that
such moves should have come as Britain, albeit
unknowingly, was on the brink of a war which
would largely rely on maritime power to move a
major force to the other side of the world.
| |
It is
certainly true that Argentina's leaders
did not believe Britain would respond to
the invasion. |
From this mire of mistakes, it
was left to Britain's armed forces to salvage the
nation's pride. It is difficult to praise too
highly the way they rose to this challenge.
They had to fight a war 8,000
miles away in a notoriously harsh climate against
well-equipped and entrenched forces operating
only 400 miles from home who could call on their
country's entire airforce for support.
That the British armed forces
won and reclaimed the Falklands is an
extraordinary feat. But it was a close contest
and the price for this war which should never
have happened was 236 British and 750 Argentinian
dead.
Argentinian forces successfully
invaded the Falklands on April 2, 1982. It came
out of the blue as far as the British public were
concerned, but the government should have known
better.
Although the Argentinian decision
to invade the Falklands was not taken until March
26, there had been signs from the start of the
year that at least some elements in Argentina
were considering it.
Captain Nick Barker, of the ice
patrol ship HMS Endurance, which was also an
intended victim of the defence cuts, reported
back conversations with Argentinian officers who
had warned of an imminent invasion.
But government officials chose
to interpret this as special pleading for the
future of Endurance and failed to take
pre-emptive action.
In fact the decision to
decommission Endurance probably contributed to
the Argentinian Junta's decision to invade.
The Foreign Office had already
warned the decision could be misread in Buenos
Aires as a decline in Britain's commitment to the
Falklands.
It is certainly true that
Argentina's leaders did not believe Britain would
respond to the invasion.
But it was not just British
complacency which failed to head-off the crisis
in 1982. The blame also lay with the failure of
successive governments to settle a long-running
dispute with Argentina over the Falklands.
Britain and Argentina had, and
still have, competing territorial claims to the
islands dating from the 18th century. These
claims again became a source of tension during
the 1960s.
During the ensuing period
British governments, faced with determination
from the islanders to remain under British rule
and the public pressure this caused in the UK,
refused to grant Argentina concessions over
sovereignty. But neither did they strengthen
Britain's commitment to the Falklands.
Either of these options might
have averted the crisis of 1982.
None of this, of course,
excuses the decision by Argentina to invade the
Falklands, an action clearly against the will of
the islanders. But it shows the 1982 war, with
its terrible loss of life, could have been
avoided.
The trigger for the invasion
came on March 19, 1982, with the strange incident
of a group of scrap metal merchants landing on
the dependency of South Georgia and raising the
Argentinian flag.
| |
`Sailors
who could be spared were given brief
shore leave to meet wives and sweethearts
in Portsmouth to say goodbye'. |
Argentina resisted British
calls for these scrap metal merchants to be
removed and then decided the time was right for a
full-scale invasion of the Falkland Islands
themselves.
A small detachment of Royal
Marines on the islands put up a brave but futile
resistance before Governor Rex Hunt ordered them
to lay down their arms in the face of
overwhelming Argentinian forces.
The next day, April 3, a
detachment of 22 Royal Marines on South Georgia
also surrendered after a fierce battle in which
they forced down an Argentinian helicopter, badly
damaged a warship and killed four Argentinian
troops.
If the Argentinians had
believed Britain would not respond, they very
quickly found out they were mistaken.
The government now began to
redeem itself from its misjudgments over the
Falklands with fast and decisive action. But it
was the armed forces and the dockyard workers who
had to translate this resolve into practice.
Fire damage to HMS
Sheffield after it was hit by an Exocet
Famously, staff at
Portsmouth dockyard were being handed redundancy
notices caused by defence cuts when the call came
to prepare the fleet. They worked day and night
to turn ships round in days rather than weeks.
A report in The News on April 5
captured the bustle as the ships which would form
the task force were prepared for war.
`Hermes (the aircraft carrier)
was a hive of activity as truck loads of
equipment and stores arrived at the jetty. Chain
gangs of sailors, helped by aircrew officers,
kept the loading operation moving.
`Sailors who could be spared
were given brief shore leave to meet wives and
sweethearts in Portsmouth to say goodbye'.
In Southampton, a few days
later the luxury liner Canberra, quickly
converted into a troop ship, left for the South
Atlantic amid emotional scenes with military
bands playing the music of the song 'Sailing'.
Despite such scenes, many
people believed it would never come to war and
the diplomats would find a solution before the
task force completed its 8,000 mile journey to
the South Atlantic.
They were wrong. Many of the
men who sailed south during that intense period
in the spring of 1982 were destined never to
return.
Start
of the conflict
Main
Menu
|